Sitio web en Español: 

24/7/365 Emergency Hotline: 631-348-1702

Group Photo
group-photo-2024
slide-image-4-mcguire-pelaez-bennet-badge
previous arrow
next arrow

24/7/365 Emergency Hotline: 631-348-1702

If you have been arrested, or in case of an emergency, our attorneys can be reached 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, at 631-348-1702.

Common Pre-Trial Hearings in a Criminal Case

On the way to trial, many pre-trial motions and hearings may be scheduled. Usually the defense will make an “Omnibus Motion” that will include all the legal motions they will be filing. A date will then be set for the prosecution to answer the motion, as well as a court date. The motions consist of arguments concerning whether certain evidence should be included or excluded at trial. Such evidence may relate to physical evidence, statements, or identification procedures.

On the way to trial, many pre-trial motions and hearings may be scheduled. Usually the defense will make an “Omnibus Motion” that will include all the legal motions they will be filing. A date will then be set for the prosecution to answer the motion, as well as a court date. The motions consist of arguments concerning whether certain evidence should be included or excluded at trial. Such evidence may relate to physical evidence, statements, or identification procedures.

While there are many types of hearings that may be conducted during the pre-trial phase of litigation, some common ones are listed below:

  • Dunaway Hearing: determines whether the evidence seized by police resulted from a search based on probable cause. Evidence seized without probable cause for a search will not be admissible in court.
  • Huntley Hearing: determines whether statements made by the defendant are admissible. A defendant’s statements to police may be admissible at trial if they were voluntarily made and did not result from coercion.
  • Mapp Hearing: concerns the admissibility of either tangible or intangible evidence collected by the police. In order to be admissible, evidence must be obtained from a search based on probable cause.
  • Sandoval Hearing: establishes whether prior criminal or otherwise bad acts should be admitted to impeach the defendant. Prior bad acts may only be introduced if the defendant chooses to take the witness stand. To determine whether these prior bad acts are admissible for impeachment purposes, the court will consider the weight of the probative value with the prejudice it may cause the defendant.
  • Wade Hearing: concerns the fairness of identification evidence. Usually this type of hearing arises if there is a question regarding identification during a lineup, or in a photo array.

If you have been arrested and charged with a crime, it is important to have legal representation to protect your constitutional rights. Contact an experienced criminal defense attorney who will keep your best legal interests in mind. Call the criminal attorneys at the Law Office of McGuire & Pelaez, P.C. today at (631) 348-1702.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


The reCAPTCHA verification period has expired. Please reload the page.

Reviews

Son unos excelentes abogados resolvieron varias multas los recomiendo
I had a fantastic experience with McGuire, Peláez, Bennett & Belcastro, P.C. From the moment I walked in, the staff was professional, welcoming, and highly knowledgeable. They took the time to truly understand my case, answered all of my questions with patience, and kept me informed every step of the way.

What impressed me most was their dedication and responsiveness — I never felt like just another client. They genuinely cared about my outcome and worked diligently to achieve the best possible result. I’d highly recommend this firm to anyone seeking strong legal representation and peace of mind. You’re in excellent hands here!
I had an exceptional experience with the McGuire, Pelaez, Bennett & Belcastro law office . From the very beginning, the entire team was professional, responsive, and genuinely invested in helping me navigate my legal matter. They took the time to explain every step of the process and made sure I felt informed and supported the whole way through. I would highly recommend them!
Muy eficientes y trabajan muy rápido en el caso que tengan muy buena recomendación y servicio
They were a big help with a case I had that had been prolonged by NYC. With their help I avoided 8 points & an increase on my insurance. Can't recommend them enough, well worth the money.
Me fue bien. Trabajan muy bien. Son recomendados
js_loader
Skip to content