Sitio web en Español: 

24/7/365 Emergency Hotline: 631-348-1702

Group Photo
group-photo-2024
slide-image-4-mcguire-pelaez-bennet-badge
previous arrow
next arrow

24/7/365 Emergency Hotline: 631-348-1702

If you have been arrested, or in case of an emergency, our attorneys can be reached 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, at 631-348-1702.

Common Pre-Trial Hearings in a Criminal Case

On the way to trial, many pre-trial motions and hearings may be scheduled. Usually the defense will make an “Omnibus Motion” that will include all the legal motions they will be filing. A date will then be set for the prosecution to answer the motion, as well as a court date. The motions consist of arguments concerning whether certain evidence should be included or excluded at trial. Such evidence may relate to physical evidence, statements, or identification procedures.

On the way to trial, many pre-trial motions and hearings may be scheduled. Usually the defense will make an “Omnibus Motion” that will include all the legal motions they will be filing. A date will then be set for the prosecution to answer the motion, as well as a court date. The motions consist of arguments concerning whether certain evidence should be included or excluded at trial. Such evidence may relate to physical evidence, statements, or identification procedures.

While there are many types of hearings that may be conducted during the pre-trial phase of litigation, some common ones are listed below:

  • Dunaway Hearing: determines whether the evidence seized by police resulted from a search based on probable cause. Evidence seized without probable cause for a search will not be admissible in court.
  • Huntley Hearing: determines whether statements made by the defendant are admissible. A defendant’s statements to police may be admissible at trial if they were voluntarily made and did not result from coercion.
  • Mapp Hearing: concerns the admissibility of either tangible or intangible evidence collected by the police. In order to be admissible, evidence must be obtained from a search based on probable cause.
  • Sandoval Hearing: establishes whether prior criminal or otherwise bad acts should be admitted to impeach the defendant. Prior bad acts may only be introduced if the defendant chooses to take the witness stand. To determine whether these prior bad acts are admissible for impeachment purposes, the court will consider the weight of the probative value with the prejudice it may cause the defendant.
  • Wade Hearing: concerns the fairness of identification evidence. Usually this type of hearing arises if there is a question regarding identification during a lineup, or in a photo array.

If you have been arrested and charged with a crime, it is important to have legal representation to protect your constitutional rights. Contact an experienced criminal defense attorney who will keep your best legal interests in mind. Call the criminal attorneys at the Law Office of McGuire & Pelaez, P.C. today at (631) 348-1702.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


The reCAPTCHA verification period has expired. Please reload the page.

Reviews

Mi experiencia con los los Abogados en Mcguirre, Peláez son muy profesionales le recomendaría a mucha de mis amigos hispanos
I can’t recommend Brett Bennett — or really, anyone at McGuire, Peláez & Bennett — highly enough. Hiring Brett was hands-down one of the best decisions I’ve made (and trust me, given why I needed a lawyer, I’ve made some questionable ones).

From the start, Brett made the whole process so much less stressful. He’s approachable, sharp, and always available to chat — no legal jargon, no intimidation, just solid, straightforward guidance. My case wasn’t exactly simple, but Brett’s expertise and understanding of the law turned what felt like a mess into a remarkably favorable outcome. Way beyond what I expected.

Also, special shoutout to the receptionist — she was an absolute gem. Every time I called, she was kind, helpful, and somehow managed to make the whole experience feel a little less daunting.

Bottom line: Brett was affordable, worth every penny, and then some. If you’re reading reviews wondering who to trust with your legal headache — take it from me, this is your guy.
Los abogados son expertos en lo que hacen. Me an ayudado anteriormente y hicieron un buen trabajo. Las muchas de frente son muy buena gente.
Response from the owner:Gracias. Thank you Juan.
Daslin helped so much in reducing my traffic ticket. All points were absolved, and I just had to pay a fee. I highly recommend!
Response from the owner:Thank you Yanni. We're proud of our staff and their commitment to excellence and professionalism. We are so happy to have been able to help you.
I couldn't be more pleased with the service. When I found myself in a frustrating traffic ticket situation, their team clearly explained my options, answered my questions, and resolved the issue. My ticket was reduced to 0 points and just a small fee. Special thanks to Daslin!
Response from the owner:Thank you John. So glad we could help.
Response from the owner:Thank you Edgar!
js_loader
Skip to content