Sitio web en Español: 

24/7/365 Emergency Hotline: 631-348-1702

Group Photo
group-photo-2024
slide-image-4-mcguire-pelaez-bennet-badge
previous arrow
next arrow

24/7/365 Emergency Hotline: 631-348-1702

If you have been arrested, or in case of an emergency, our attorneys can be reached 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, at 631-348-1702.

A Look Into New York’s First Case Under New Definition of “Parent”

The New York Times reports that the first case to test New York State’s new definition of parent is underway. On August 30, 2016 the New York Court of Appeals issued a monumental decision regarding the definition of “parent” in relation to visitation and custody determinations. The case of Brooke S.B. v. Elizabeth A. C.C., held that after a party proves “by clear and convincing evidence” that both parties had come to an agreement to conceive and raise a child together, then they will be deemed a “parent” in relation to seeking custody and visitation. Prior to the ruling, New York law held that only an adoptive or biological parent had the ability to seek custody or visitation.

The New York Times reports that the first case to test New York State’s new definition of parent is underway. On August 30, 2016 the New York Court of Appeals issued a monumental decision regarding the definition of “parent” in relation to visitation and custody determinations. The case of Brooke S.B. v. Elizabeth A. C.C., held that after a party proves “by clear and convincing evidence” that both parties had come to an agreement to conceive and raise a child together, then they will be deemed a “parent” in relation to seeking custody and visitation. Prior to the ruling, New York law held that only an adoptive or biological parent had the ability to seek custody or visitation.

The new ruling took aim at allowing same-sex couples who have raised a child together, to obtain custody and visitation. The ruling comes after New York’s recognition of same-sex marriage, and the US Supreme Court’s 2015 decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, which expanded the fundamental right of marriage to same-sex couples as well. The definition is being tested during a New York Supreme Court case between two women who are arguing custody of a six-year-old boy.

Kelly Gunn, the former partner of Circe Hamilton has commenced an action to determine whether Ms. Gunn can be recognized as a parent to the six-year-old boy that Ms. Hamilton adopted in 2011. Ms. Gunn and Ms. Hamilton began dating in 2004. In early 2009 the two filled out paperwork to adopt a child. Because Ethiopia has restrictions against same-sex couples adopting children, Ms. Hamilton was the named adoptive parent and Ms. Gunn was named as a roommate on the adoption papers. Testimony has shown that two had intentions of raising the child together. In December of 2009, the couple decided to break up. Ms. Hamilton testified that she moved forward with the adoption alone.

The two remained close over time, and Ms. Gunn even accompanied Ms. Hamilton on the flight home after the adoption of Abush. The testimony shows that Ms. Gunn remained close with the child, cared for the child regularly, attended doctors’ appointments with the child, and employed Ms. Hamilton at her design firm. Ms. Gunn’s testimony compared her relationship with the child as one of a couple who had broken up during a biological pregnancy. The extensive testimony focused on the level of Ms. Gunn’s relationship.

Ms. Gunn’s relationship to the child is important to the determination of whether Ms. Gunn will be deemed a parent under New York State law. Ms. Gunn and Ms. Hamilton dispute whether after the separation in 2009, they were still in agreement to raise the child together. The facts of the relationship following the break-up will help determine whether the two entered into an agreement to raise the child together. The determination of Ms. Gunn’s legal relationship to the child is crucial because Ms. Hamilton is looking to move back to her native London with Abush. Without legal custody or visitation rights, Ms. Gunn cannot prevent Abush from leaving. Until this case is brought to a conclusion, the judge has confiscated Abush’s passport.

If your former partner has temporary custody of your child or children, you can bring a petition seeking permanent custody or visitation. It is important that you are aware of your rights when it comes to you and your children. If you are seeking custody or visitation of your child, contact the Suffolk County family law attorneys of Mcguire & Peláez, PC. Ms. Peláez has practiced daily in the Family Court for more than 10 years as private and Court appointed counsel, and she will zealously fight for your rights as a parent. Contact us at (631) 348-1702.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


The reCAPTCHA verification period has expired. Please reload the page.

Reviews

Mi experiencia con los los Abogados en Mcguirre, Peláez son muy profesionales le recomendaría a mucha de mis amigos hispanos
I can’t recommend Brett Bennett — or really, anyone at McGuire, Peláez & Bennett — highly enough. Hiring Brett was hands-down one of the best decisions I’ve made (and trust me, given why I needed a lawyer, I’ve made some questionable ones).

From the start, Brett made the whole process so much less stressful. He’s approachable, sharp, and always available to chat — no legal jargon, no intimidation, just solid, straightforward guidance. My case wasn’t exactly simple, but Brett’s expertise and understanding of the law turned what felt like a mess into a remarkably favorable outcome. Way beyond what I expected.

Also, special shoutout to the receptionist — she was an absolute gem. Every time I called, she was kind, helpful, and somehow managed to make the whole experience feel a little less daunting.

Bottom line: Brett was affordable, worth every penny, and then some. If you’re reading reviews wondering who to trust with your legal headache — take it from me, this is your guy.
Los abogados son expertos en lo que hacen. Me an ayudado anteriormente y hicieron un buen trabajo. Las muchas de frente son muy buena gente.
Response from the owner:Gracias. Thank you Juan.
Daslin helped so much in reducing my traffic ticket. All points were absolved, and I just had to pay a fee. I highly recommend!
Response from the owner:Thank you Yanni. We're proud of our staff and their commitment to excellence and professionalism. We are so happy to have been able to help you.
I couldn't be more pleased with the service. When I found myself in a frustrating traffic ticket situation, their team clearly explained my options, answered my questions, and resolved the issue. My ticket was reduced to 0 points and just a small fee. Special thanks to Daslin!
Response from the owner:Thank you John. So glad we could help.
Response from the owner:Thank you Edgar!
js_loader
Skip to content